One Unified Cost Table
Adam is rebuilding the workbook from the available scope inputs and assigning each feature to the correct option. Prior cost/scope tables are archival evidence, not controlling pricing.
OWNER · ADAM
#outokumpu_proposals · C0B72HGD8TY
A decision-ready memory of the active crane-operator training simulator proposal: current scope, pricing architecture, owners, unresolved decisions, source files, and the newest proposal visuals.
The source material is strong enough. The current bottleneck is reconciliation: one controlling feature list, one unified cost table, and one final decision on whether the enterprise option belongs in the client package.
The proposal is no longer waiting on discovery. It is waiting on a clean scope-and-price spine.
Adam is rebuilding the workbook from the available scope inputs and assigning each feature to the correct option. Prior cost/scope tables are archival evidence, not controlling pricing.
OWNER · ADAMSara will finalize feature and option pages once Greg confirms which language is authoritative. Proposal page 13 is the closest existing source for the standard feature-list structure.
OWNERS · GREG + SARAConfirm final prices, deadline, recipient list, submission format, controller commitment, and whether Extra Large stays in the proposal before anything is sent.
GATE · HUMAN APPROVALThese are Greg's current scope anchors. They are not approved final pricing.
The intended package is compact and specific, not boilerplate-heavy.
Slack-hosted originals copied into this review page so they render reliably.




These screenshots explain why consolidation is needed. They are inputs, not approved outputs.








Slack and internal-system links may require ForgeFX authentication.