Rachel's estimator
The working-out. Hours per feature times the rate. This is where the price is actually built. Full package: $1,549,283.
Outokumpu Crane Training Simulator
Three documents describe the same job. Two of them disagree about what it costs, on every single line.
There are two price lists for this deal and they do not match. The slide deck says the full package costs $1,549,283. The spreadsheet says $1,753,349. That is $204,066 of difference for exactly the same fourteen items.
The working-out. Hours per feature times the rate. This is where the price is actually built. Full package: $1,549,283.
What the customer sees. Matches the estimator exactly, feature by feature: $1,549,283. Updated 5 August.
What Salesforce links to. Every feature costs more than the estimator says. Totals $1,753,349. Last touched 2 August.
It would be easier if one row were wrong. It is not. Every one of the fourteen rows in the spreadsheet is higher than the estimator — never lower, not once. That does not happen by accident.
The pattern splits cleanly in two.
| What happened | Rows | How much higher |
|---|---|---|
| A small markup applied on top | 9 | +2.29% each — identical to the decimal |
| A bigger, separate change to the framework | 1 | +25.0% |
| Lessons priced differently | 3 | +27.1% each |
| Priced at zero in one, $15,000 in the other | 1 | +$15,000 |
Nine rows off by exactly the same 2.29% is the tell. Nobody re-estimates nine separate things and lands on the same percentage nine times. Somebody applied a deliberate uplift across the board.
Ten of the fourteen items are training lessons, and they are the largest block of money in the deal. The estimator prices a lesson at $58,769. The spreadsheet prices the same lesson at $74,676.
| Item | Estimator | Spreadsheet | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 lesson | $58,769 | $74,676 | +$15,907 |
| 3 more lessons | $176,307 | $224,028 | +$47,721 |
| 6 more lessons | $352,614 | $448,056 | +$95,442 |
| Lessons alone | $587,690 | $746,760 | +$159,070 |
So the lessons account for $159,070 of the $204,066 gap. Nearly four fifths of it.
Both documents add up correctly. Each one is internally consistent — the columns sum to the totals printed at the bottom. Comparing the two totals tells you they differ. It does not tell you that every row differs, or that nine of them differ by the same amount. That only shows up row by row.